In a perfect world
Contrary to many opinions, there are legitimate reasons for using an electronic voting system. They provide much greater flexibility in creating ballots in the languages needed for the community. They also provide better support for blind or disabled voters. Last, and certainly least, the quick tabulation can satisfy America's need for immediate gratification.
Of course, the problems in such systems as currently implemented are manifold and obvious, even to those without need of tin-foil head gear. Closed-source software is easily manipulated, both by political operatives and unscrupulous vendors. Using the same system to create check logs as is used to count the votes means that a single failure will invalidate both the votes and the logs. And most telling, the lack of a physical ballot precludes the opportunity for manual recount. We have to trust the machines.
There is a solution, although the current political climate makes it unlikely to see production. Use a machine to produce on-screen ballots in whatever languages required. After reviewing his or her selections, the voter presses a "Vote" button, which prints a human- and machine-readable paper ballot. The voter takes this ballot to the desk, and drops it into the locked ballot box as their official vote for purposes of counts and certification.
This system satisfies the needs of a diverse society with a short attention span, allows for quick optical scanning of identically printed ballots, and still provides paper ballots of record should a manual, non-electronic recount be desired. It would pointless to hack this system, as the human-readable ballots would tip off the voter to any impropriety. But sadly, this system is completely illegal in Florida.
Florida, like many other states, provides its citizens with an illusion of participation in democracy, while covering the entire process in a thick layer of partisan trickery. An exhaustive detailing of the various laws and policies which govern the voting process would, well, exhaust me; suffice it to say that the Secretary of State gets to set the rules governing elections largely as she sees fit, and that Secretary of State is a political appointment. Change for the better, if it comes at all, will be slow in coming, and only after the concerted efforts of non-partisan voting rights and election reform groups.
But in election season, I like to dream of a perfect world.







